Tuesday, February 28, 2006

UNGS 2050

SAYA SEKADAR INGIN MELUAHKAN RASA KEBOSANAN DAN KEMENGANTUKAN TERHADAP KELAS UNGS 2050. Rasa cam kena brainwash je duk dalam kelas tu. Slot 1 jam boleh tahan lagi. Slot 2 jam tu...killing me bit by bit...korang semua ok ke?

6 comments:

izra said...

hehehe rupa2nya awk pun bosan+ngantuk dlm kelas ungs 2050.tp saya tgk awk mcm m'dgr dgn penuh khusyu' je.semua org pun bosan saya rasa.as for me, saya dah malas nak layan.especially lps that 'stupid with capital S,bold and underline' thing.my body is always in the class, but my mind, it likes to travel a lot hehehe don't worry,it will be over soon.in the meantime,let's hold our breath.

Nurhidayati Abd Aziz said...

Er... Actually, I kind of enjoy the class. Not because of the lecturer, but of the contents.

Well, you know me, thinking is my second best favorite things apart from books.

Mengantuk jugak, but the thinking kept me awake. Though I still wish the class had been a bit more 'interesting' and the lecturer a bit more, er... 'sr.anil-ish'?

nurul said...

isma berangan...
isma duk sebelah saya....
saya duk sebelah isma....
saya berangan.....

apa yang pasti the 2hour lecture makes me hungry.

kroit..kroit..kroit perut berbunyi.
ok,sampai di sini kali ini.

Shana said...

I'm prefectly fine. Sbb dah ambik kan. Huahua.

I noticed a trend. It has an increasing gradient. He was ok in RKUD. Not so nice in our UNGS. And just plain bad in your UNGS.

It'll be over soon! :)

Ann said...

saya simpati ngan korang semua. i wondered if he got problem with his brain.Just hold on a little bit more. Anyway sy amat bersyukur dah selamat ambk sbjk ni.masa dlm kelas sy duduk dpn dan selalu jd target kn jawab soalan dia. waktu bosan sy tgk org sekeliling sy yg mempamer aksi menarik menahan ngantuk esp Fauzan.pastu gelak2 ngan Arshana.

lutfi lukman said...

Studying ethics is just like learning to think logically, in which, we're already capable of doing so. To differentiate between the good and the bad? duh? Do we have to learn that?

One more, it's just trying to make us realize about our everyday actions for no reason at all and sometimes giving it names. Giving it names! What for? Besides, he's more like teaching philosophy rather than ethics n fiqh.

eating. eating with hand? spoon? fork? chopstick? the food...we have to look into the aesthetical value of the food, the texture, the taste. Oh, the taste...remind us to our tongue...the receptor on our tongue. The tongue is very important, we have to take care of it. Speak nice words only.
God. Do we have to think all that? If we do, then breakfast would be 3 hours, lunch 5 hours, dinner 5 hours, half an hour each time drinking from the water cooler etc.
I hate it. Seems so STUPID (camane nak bold n underline?) That's not creative thinking. It is an in depth thinking, but a useless one. I do like thinking, but not on such stupid issue such as defining our everyday actions for no apparent reason at all. Even if u want to define it, give us something new, like what Prof Al-Attas did in his book. Now that's a brilliant thinking! Don't just say this is right and that is wrong. We knew that already!!
It's like someone is nagging about the same thing over and over again. Annoying and irritating.